Abstract

Technological innovations often formulate new market regimes and create incentives to abandon existing, less attractive ones. However, this decision depends not only on market forces, such as economic and technological uncertainty, but also on attitudes toward risk. Although greater risk aversion typically raises the incentive to postpone investment, the impact of risk aversion becomes more complex when a firm has discretion over both the timing and the size of a project. We develop a utility-based regime-switching framework in order to analyze how a firm with discretion over investment timing and project scale may choose to abandon an existing market regime to enter a new one. Results indicate that greater risk aversion hastens investment in an existing regime by decreasing the amount of installed capacity, but delays its abandonment, thereby hindering the transition to a new one. In contrast, greater demand uncertainty in the new market regime raises the value of the investment opportunity and, in turn, the incentive to abandon the existing regime. Furthermore, we find that uncertainty over the arrival of a technological innovation may accelerate investment in the existing regime and reduce the relative loss in project value in the absence of managerial discretion over project scale.

Highlights

  • I N THE past few decades, the rapid pace of innovation and intense research and development (R&D) activities in many industries, such as information technologies, renewable energy (RE), and telecommunications, has resulted in several technological innovations

  • By incorporating attitudes toward risk via a hyperbolic absolute risk aversion (HARA) utility function, we find that the interaction between demand and technological uncertainty is rather strong and that market regime asymmetry can impact the decision to abandon an existing regime in order to switch to a new one, considerably

  • The increasing frequency of technological innovations indicates that the developing world reflects a rapid-growing market rather than just a low-cost manufacturing base

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

I N THE past few decades, the rapid pace of innovation and intense research and development (R&D) activities in many industries, such as information technologies, renewable energy (RE), and telecommunications, has resulted in several technological innovations. The aforementioned examples illustrate how timely technology switch is key for corporate strategy, as it may determine the success or failure of a company as a whole in any industry that is subject to a rapid pace of innovation This decision becomes rather complex when it entails irreversible capacity investment in the light of evolving uncertainties and risk aversion. An early transition to a new market regime allows a firm to limit its exposure to downside risk from remaining in a declining old market, waiting enables the firm to observe the market and make a more informed irreversible capacity investment decision By analyzing this tradeoff, our contribution to the existing literature is threefold.

RELATED WORK
MODEL SETUP
Regime 3
Regime 2
Regime 1
NUMERICAL EXAMPLES
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call