Abstract

Epidemiologists have documented both acute short-term and chronic long-term damages associated with exposure to air pollution, while atmospheric scientists have demonstrated that air pollution exposure depends on stochastic meteorological conditions. We analyze the implications of these features for the optimal regulation of pollution emissions. Our model incorporates abatement costs, separate acute and chronic damage components, and stochastic pollution exposure. We characterize the optimal path of pollution regulation and total expected costs under three different scenarios regarding the regulator's ability to update policy and forecast meteorological conditions. We also present a numerical example of sulfur dioxide emissions and small particulate matter concentrations from electric power plants in northeast Ohio. In the example, dynamic updating of regulation provides significantly more benefits when combined with accurate forecasts of current meteorological conditions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.