Abstract

Public transport passenger demand is inevitably made non-uniform because of spatial and temporal land use planning. This non-uniformity warrants the use of public transport operational strategies to attain operating efficiency. The optimization of these strategies is commonly being done from the operator perspective, and indirectly from the user perspective. However, the environmental perspective of these strategies, in terms of vehicle’s emission, has not been investigated. This study proposed a methodology to analyze the benefits of using transit operational strategies to reduce operating cost and eventually also to reduce undesirable emissions. First, a strategy-based optimization model is established to minimize the number of transit vehicles required. Four candidate operational strategies are considered in this model, including full route operation (FRO), short turn, limited stop, and a combination of limited stop and short turn. Second, the pollutant emissions of transit vehicles are estimated by the MOVES emission model. The developed methodology is applied to a real life case study in Dalian, China. Results show that the use of operational strategies can not only significantly save the number of vehicles by 12.5%, but also reduce emissions of pollutants (i.e., CO2, HC, CO, NOx, PM2.5) by approximately 13%, compared with applying FRO strategy exclusively. In addition, both benefits can be further enhanced through the use of an efficient payment mode (e.g., off-board or contactless card) or improving bus performance in deceleration/acceleration as well as doors opening and closing at a stop.

Highlights

  • The rapid growth of private vehicle ownership and usage has been made significant accessibility and convenience for human travel activities

  • The results of operational strategies-based model are compared with the full route operation (FRO) strategy, without other strategies added, to illustrate reductions in emissions of approximately 13% for each of five pollutants: CO2, HC, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and PM2.5

  • We proposed a methodology to analyze the benefits of using transit operational strategies to reduce operating cost and undesirable emissions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The rapid growth of private vehicle ownership and usage has been made significant accessibility and convenience for human travel activities. Due to the fact that a common full route operation (FRO) strategy is used for meeting imbalanced travel demand in most cities throughout the world, full advantage is not always taken of public transit resources This inefficient operation situation will create the undesirable in-vehicle crowding in some segments with high travel demand, excessive empty seats in other segments with low travel demand, and increases of operating cost as well as round trip time. One efficient method in previous studies is to use multiple operational strategies to suit the observed travel demand in the best possible manner, such as limited stop, short turn, deadheading, and mixed strategy. MOtor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) model is available for the use in transportation projects of actual estimation of environmental impacts[27] It is a new-generation regulatory emission model developed by the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), to replace MOBILE.

Methodology
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call