Abstract

We explore the factors affecting the optimal plot design (size and type as well as the subsample tree selection strategies within a plot) and their relative importance in defining the optimal plot design in amultipurpose forest inventory. The factors include time used to lay out the plot and to make the tree measurements within the plot, the between-plot variation of each of the variables of interest in the area, and the measurement and model errors for the different variables. We simulate different plot types and sizes and subsample tree selection strategies on measuredtest areas from North Lapland. The plot types used are fixed-radius, concentric and relascope plots. Weselect the optimal type and size first at plot level using a cost-plus-loss approach and then at cluster level byminimizing the weighted standard error with fixed budget. As relascope plots are very efficient at the plot level for volume and basal area, and fixed-radius plots for stems per ha, the optimal plot type strongly depends on the relative importance of these variables. The concentric plot seems to be a good compromise between these two in many cases. The subsample tree selection strategy was more important in selecting optimal plot than many other factors. In cluster level, the most important factor is the transfer time between plots. While the optimal radius of plots and other parameters were sensitive to the measurement times and other cost factors, the concentric plot type was optimal in almost all studied cases. Subsample tree measurement strategies need further studies, as they were an important cost factor. However, their importance to the precision was not as clear.

Highlights

  • We explore the factors affecting the optimal plot design and their relative importance in defining the optimal plot design in amultipurpose forest inventory

  • It is even possible to optimize the measurements of trees in the plots, for instance to determine how many subsample trees to measure out of the total number of tally trees, if we can anticipate the error in the volume estimates of the tally trees

  • When the average relative RMSE (Equation 4) was plotted as a function of measurement times for different plot types and forest characteristics, it was clear that the relascope plot type was very efficient for volume and basal area, while the fixed-radius plot was best for stems per ha (Fig. 5)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We explore the factors affecting the optimal plot design (size and type as well as the subsample tree selection strategies within a plot) and their relative importance in defining the optimal plot design in amultipurpose forest inventory. Defining optimal sample plot size and type analytically would require that we can anticipate the effects of the plot size and type on the population (or between-plot) variance. If the expected between-plot variation can be expressed as a function of plot size (see Freese 1961, Zeide 1980) the optimal plot size can be calculated analytically. Such a function can only be an approximation of the between-plot variation as the relationship depends on the characteristics of the population such as spatial pattern of the trees, which cannot fully be described with a model

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.