Abstract
Abstract Background Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI is considered the standard for noninvasive assessment of 3D scar architecture. Intraprocedural integration of 3D scar models improve the outcome of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT). A pixel signal intensity (PSI) cut-off of 40 to 60% has been widely used for conventional bright-blood LGE MRI. Novel 3D MRI acquisitions with dark-blood (DB) nulling with higher spatial resolution and superior detection of (subendocardial) scar patterns are increasingly available, but the optimal pixel signal intensity (PSI) value remains unknown. Purpose To compare the accuracy of the 3D DB MRI-derived endocardial scar reconstructions at three different PSI cut-offs with endocardial electro-anatomical contact mapping in patients with scar-related VT. Methods Preprocedural 3D DB LGE MRIs were retrospectively compared to high-density endocardial left-ventricular (LV) bipolar voltage mapping (cut-off 0.5-1.5mV) obtained during endocardial mapping at sinus rhythm using the ADAS3D software. The LV scar models were aligned using the mitral valve, left ventricular apex and aorta cusps. Points with a Euclidean node-to-node distance of ≥10 mm were excluded. Variable upper PSI thresholds were set at 50%, 60% and 70%; the lower threshold at two-thirds of the upper limit. The 10% LV layer from the 3D MRI was used. The pairs of points were checked for agreement for scar or healthy (%). The Pearson correlation was used to analyze the agreement between core scar, border zone and healthy tissue area (in %) at three thresholds. Results Ten patients (90% male, mean age 65±11 year, 8 ischemic/2 nonischemic, LV ejection fraction 41±6%) were analyzed. A mean of 2024 (range 385-6810) pairs were analyzed per patient at three PSI thresholds. A correct correlation for scar or healthy was present in 67%, 69% and 69% for the upper PSI thresholds of 50%, 60% and 70% respectively. The optimal match was obtained for an upper PSI cutoff value of 70%, for healthy (r2=0.57; P=0.01), border zone (r2=0.73; P=0.01), 50% for core (r2=0.09; P=0.39). Using a 60% PSI cutoff the scar core % increased significantly compared to the 70% cutoff (12.8 ±13.8 versus 4.9±7.3, P=0.001). Conclusion The optimal depiction of the boundary between healthy and border zone scar by 3D DB MRI is best depicted at an upper PSI threshold of 70%.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.