Abstract

Traps are an efficient method of capturing prey for ambush predators, but trap building and maintenance are costly. We describe suitable hunting sites for pit-building antlion larvae living in sand dunes based on its cost–benefit relationship. In the field, antlion pits were located near natural barriers, such as cliffs, rocks and vegetation, but not closest to these barriers. Our results show that this pattern of pit location did not differ between populations; neither with or without the influence of a specific dipteran parasitoid of antlion larvae. Artificial pitfall traps deployed in their habitats revealed that invertebrates move along barriers, likely through thigmotaxis (wall hugging or wall-following), and drop sands in the traps set at barrier edges. In the laboratory, repeated artificial destruction of pits from larval antlions induced frequent pit relocation and rebuilding. This task reduces life history parameters, such as the larval growth and food conversion rates, suggesting a high cost of pit maintenance. Thus, antlion pits might shift away from barrier edges where more prey is available but pit destruction occurs more frequently due to wall-following invertebrates. Such disturbance may explain why antlions are not located closest to these barriers.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.