Abstract
It has been widely debated what a central bank should do to stimulate the economy when the nominal interest rate is at the zero lower bound (ZLB). The optimal monetary policy literature suggests that monetary policy inertia, i.e., committing to continue a zero interest regime even after the ZLB is not binding, is a way to get the economy out of recession. In this paper, I examine whether this result holds when monetary policy has not only the conventional demandside effect but also a supply-side effect on the economy. To accomplish this objective, I incorporate the cost channel of monetary policy into an otherwise standard new Keynesian model and evaluate the optimal monetary policy at the ZLB. The study reveals several important insights in the conduct of the optimal monetary policy in a cost channel economy at the ZLB. Importantly, the discretionary policy requires central banks to keep interest rates at the ZLB for longer in a cost channel economy compared to no-cost channel economies. Further, cost channel economies introduce a policy trade-off between inflation and output gap. In contrast, under commitment policy, the simulation exercise shows that the central bank is able to terminate the zero interest rate regime earlier in a cost channel economy than otherwise. It is also revealed that the cost channel generates substantially high welfare losses, under both discretionary and commitment policies. Accordingly, abstracting the cost channel in these types of models can lead to under estimation of welfare losses.
Highlights
The zero lower bound on nominal interest rates (ZLB) is no longer just a theoretical interest
The main objective of this paper is to examine central bank policy options at the ZLB in a cost channel economy
I considered that the economy was initially in a recession with a liquidity trap following a large negative demand shock
Summary
The zero lower bound on nominal interest rates (ZLB) is no longer just a theoretical interest. Prescott, in their seminal paper "Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans" [; Kydland and Prescott (1977)], showed how an announcement of commitment to a low inflation regime by monetary authorities might create lower private sector inflationary expectations. In their seminal paper "Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans" [; Kydland and Prescott (1977)], showed how an announcement of commitment to a low inflation regime by monetary authorities might create lower private sector inflationary expectations They argued that if this monetary policy is changed and interest rates are reduced to give a short-term lift to employment, credibility of policy makers will be lost and conditions may worsen
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.