Abstract

Whales migrate long distances and reproduce on a finite store of energy. Budgeting the use of this limited energy reserve is an important factor to ensure survival over the period of migration and to maximize reproductive investment. For some whales, migration routes are closely associated with coastal areas, exposing animals to high levels of human activity. It is currently unclear how various forms of human activity may disturb whales during migration, how this might impact their energy balance and how this could translate into long-term demographic changes. Here, we develop a theoretical bioenergetic model for migrating humpback whales to investigate the optimal migration strategy that minimizes energy use. The average migration velocity was an important driver of the total energy used by a whale, and an optimal velocity of 1.1 m s(-1) was determined. This optimal velocity is comparable to documented observed migration speeds, suggesting that whales migrate at a speed that conserves energy. Furthermore, the amount of resting time during migration was influenced by both transport costs and feeding rates. We simulated hypothetical disturbances to the optimal migration strategy in two ways, by altering average velocity to represent changes in behavioural activity and by increasing total travelled distance to represent displacement along the migration route. In both cases, disturbance increased overall energy use, with implications for the growth potential of calves.

Highlights

  • All animals require energy to sustain life

  • We develop a bioenergetic model for migrating humpback whales

  • We focus on lactating females in the optimal migration simulations, because they expend more energy compared with other life stages or sexes (Lockyer, 1986; Fortune et al, 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

All animals require energy to sustain life. Maximizing the efficiency of energy intake and subsequent use drives foraging patterns (Perry and Pianka, 1997), life-history traits, such as breeding strategy (Gadgil and Bossert, 1970) and hibernation (Nedergaard and Cannon, 1990; French, 1992), and natural selection (Lotka, 1922). The survival and reproductive success of a population requires sufficient energy intake and efficient energy use. Any natural or human-induced disruptions to these processes, such as a reduction in food availability or an increase in energy demands, may have longterm implications for population survival and growth (Croxall et al, 1999; Oro and Furness, 2002; Rode et al, 2010).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.