Abstract
Key Points The presence and complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD) as well as angiography‐guided percutaneous coronary intervention regardless of completeness were not associated with worse outcomes compared to those without CAD undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Revascularization of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI is safe, but should not be performed routinely. Revascularization should be guided by the heart team. Future randomized studies are needed to address whether revascularization in patients with CAD undergoing TAVI impacts clinical outcomes post‐TAVI and if so, does completeness or timing of revascularization play a role.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
