Abstract

This paper reexamines the design of an optimal insurance contract with background risk from the perspective of an insured by imposing an incentive compatible constraint. The incentive compatibility means that both parties in an insurance contract are obligated to pay more for a larger realization of loss. As standard in the literature, it is assumed that the insurer is risk-neutral, that is, the insurance premium is calculated based only upon the expected indemnity. When the insured has a general mean-variance preference, we derive explicitly an optimal insurance form, which heavily relies on conditional expectation function (CEF) of background risk with respect to the insurable risk and is often significantly different from one that is obtained in the absence of incentive compatibility. It suggests that both the incentive compatible constraint and the dependence between background risk and the insurable risk play very important roles in the insured's risk transfer decision. Finally, optimal insurance is discussed in detail for some special CEFs the derivative of which has less than one change point.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.