Abstract

In the classical Expected-Utility framework, a problem of optimal insurance design with a premium constraint is equivalent to a problem of optimal insurance design with a minimum expected retention constraint. When the insurer has ambiguous beliefs represented by a non-additive probability measure, as in Schmeidler (1989), this equivalence no longer holds. A problem of optimal insurance design with a premium constraint determined based on the insurer’s ambiguous beliefs is not equivalent to a problem of optimal insurance design with a minimum expected retention determined based on the insurer’s ambiguous beliefs. Recently, Amarante, Ghossoub, and Phelps (2014) examined the problem of optimal insurance design with a premium constraint when the insurer has ambiguous beliefs. In particular, they showed that when the insurer is ambiguity-seeking, with a concave distortion of the insured’s probability measure, then the optimal indemnity schedule is a state-contingent deductible schedule, in which the deductible depends on the state of the world only through the insurer’s distortion function. In this paper, we examine the problem of optimal insurance design with a minimum expected retention constraint, in the case where the insurer is ambiguity-seeking. We obtain the aforementioned result of Amarante, Ghossoub, and Phelps (2014) and the classical result of Arrow (1971) as special cases.

Highlights

  • In the classical problem of optimal insurance design, it is well known since the work of Arrow [1]that when the insured is a risk-averse expected utility (EU) maximizer and the insurer is a risk-neutralEU maximizer, the indemnity schedule that maximizes the insured’s expected utility ofterminalwealth subject to a premium constraint is a deductible indemnity of the form Y “ max 0, Xd, where X is the loss random variable and d ě 0 is a given constant deductible.For a given indemnity schedule Y, the premium constraint is a constraint of the form: ż Π ě p1 ` ρqYdP where Π ě 0 is the premium paid and ρ ě 0 is a loading factor

  • We focus in this paper on Choquet integration as an aggregation concept for decision-making under ambiguity, and we consider the Choquet expected utility (CEU) model of Schmeidler [8] as a model of decision-making under ambiguity

  • Motivated by empirical evidence suggesting that insurers tend to exhibit more ambiguity than the insured individuals (e.g., [13]), AGP [14] study the problem of optimal insurance design in a setting where the insurer has ambiguous beliefs about the realizations of the insurable loss, whereas the insured does not

Read more

Summary

A Service of zbw

Suggested Citation: Amarante, Massimiliano; Ghossoub, Mario (2016) : Optimal insurance for a minimal expected retention: The case of an ambiguity-seeking insurer, Risks, ISSN 2227-9091, MDPI, Basel, Vol 4, Iss. 1, pp. Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen. Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Optimal Insurance for a Minimal Expected Retention: The Case of an Ambiguity-Seeking Insurer

Introduction
Ambiguity in Optimal Insurance Design
Related Literature
This Paper’s Contribution
Outline
Setup and Preliminaries
The Insurance Design Problem
Preliminaries
A Characterization of the Optimal Indemnity Schedule
A Special Case
Background
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.