Abstract
The paper aims to mitigate financial risk in highly volatile shipping freight markets by employing a dynamic hedging model. The primary criterion for evaluating the effectiveness of various methods for estimating optimal hedge ratios through Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs) is the minimum variance hedging rule. Four different methods are utilized to estimate two types of hedge ratios. The first type, a static hedge ratio, is calculated using the OLS and ECM methods. The second type, a time-varying hedge ratio, is determined through a bivariate GARCH model and a Rolling Window OLS method. Additionally, the hedging effectiveness of the traditional method of hedging, time chartering, is compared to the more modern and sophisticated shipping derivatives methods using the coefficient of variation. Highlights Estimating optimal hedge ratios through Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs) with the minimum variance hedging rule Four different methods are utilized to estimate two types of hedge ratios for static and dynamic hedging Assess the hedging effectiveness of the different methods of hedge ration estimation Compare the hedging effectiveness of the traditional method of hedging, time chartering, to the more modern and sophisticated shipping derivatives methods using the coefficient of variation
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
