Abstract

We explore the ability of optimal foraging theory to explain the observation among marine bacteriophages that host range appears to be negatively correlated with host abundance in the local marine environment. We modified Charnov's classic diet composition model to describe the ecological dynamics of the related generalist and specialist bacteriophages φX174 and G4, and confirmed that specialist phages are ecologically favored only at high host densities. Our modified model accurately predicted the ecological dynamics of phage populations in laboratory microcosms, but had only limited success predicting evolutionary dynamics. We monitored evolution of attachment rate, the phenotype that governs diet breadth, in phage populations adapting to both low and high host density microcosms. Although generalist φX174 populations evolved even broader diets at low host density, they did not show a tendency to evolve the predicted specialist foraging strategy at high host density. Similarly, specialist G4 populations were unable to evolve the predicted generalist foraging strategy at low host density. These results demonstrate that optimal foraging models developed to explain the behaviorally determined diets of predators may have only limited success predicting the genetically determined diets of bacteriophage, and that optimal foraging probably plays a smaller role than genetic constraints in the evolution of host specialization in bacteriophages.

Highlights

  • The advantages of host range expansion for parasites include reduced intraspecific competition for hosts, reduced time spent searching for hosts, and an increased probability of transmission to a suitable host [1]

  • In this study we investigated the ability of optimal foraging theory to explain the prevalence of host specialists among bacteriophage, parasites that are both transmitted through the environment and amenable to experimental manipulation

  • Our results confirm that optimal foraging models of diet composition developed to describe the ecological consequences of predator foraging decisions accurately describe the ecological dynamics of bacteriophage populations in laboratory microcosms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The advantages of host range expansion for parasites include reduced intraspecific competition for hosts, reduced time spent searching for hosts, and an increased probability of transmission to a suitable host [1]. Despite these advantages, parasites are most often observed to specialize on a limited number of host species. Unlike investigations of predator foraging strategies that focus on the ecological explanations for specialization, investigations of parasite foraging strategies have focused on evolutionary explanations [e.g. 3,4] often ignoring ecological explanations entirely [but see 5,6] The reason for this difference in focus is most likely methodological. Parasites are more amenable to genetic analysis and manipulation than predators, but parasites are less amenable to ecological observation

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call