Abstract

AbstractIn many spatial resource models, it is assumed that an agent is able to harvest the resource over the complete spatial domain. However, agents frequently only have access to a resource at particular locations at which a moving biomass, such as fish or game, may be caught or hunted. Here, we analyze an infinite time‐horizon optimal control problem with boundary harvesting and (systems of) parabolic partial differential equations as state dynamics. We formally derive the associated canonical system, consisting of a forward–backward diffusion system with boundary controls, and numerically compute the canonical steady states and the optimal time‐dependent paths, and their dependence on parameters. We start with some one‐species fishing models, and then extend the analysis to a predator–prey model of the Lotka–Volterra type. The models are rather generic, and our methods are quite general, and thus should be applicable to large classes of structurally similar bioeconomic problems with boundary controls.Recommedations for Resource Managers Just like ordinary differential equation‐constrained (optimal) control problems and distributed partial differential equation (PDE) constrained control problems, boundary control problems with PDE state dynamics may be formally treated by the Pontryagin's maximum principle or canonical system formalism (state and adjoint PDEs). These problems may have multiple (locally) optimal solutions; a first overview of suitable choices can be obtained by identifying canonical steady states. The computation of canonical paths toward some optimal steady state yields temporal information about the optimal harvesting, possibly including waiting time behavior for the stock to recover from a low‐stock initial state, and nonmonotonic (in time) harvesting efforts. Multispecies fishery models may lead to asymmetric effects; for instance, it may be optimal to capture a predator species to protect the prey, even for high costs and low market values of the predators.

Highlights

  • Optimal control (OC) theory is an important tool to design optimal harvesting strategies in the management of natural resources

  • The ordinary differential equation (ODE) in (37a) decouple, and the same holds true for the associated time‐dependent partial differential equations (PDEs), which makes them superficially similar to the examples in Section 3.3 but the two problems are still coupled by the boundary conditions (BC) at x = 0 in (37b)

  • We have set up one‐species and two‐species fishery models and characterized their canonical steady state (CSS), which turned out to be unique globally stable optimal steady state (OSS), except for the bistable case in the one‐ species model, for which multiple locally stable OSSs exist

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Optimal control (OC) theory is an important tool to design optimal harvesting strategies in the management of natural resources. Spatial models feature discrete patches, where at each location of the resource, the stock evolves according to an ordinary differential equation (ODE). In many cases, the continuous process of migration is more adequately described by partial differential equations (PDEs) characterizing the spread or diffusion of the resource within the domain. For the case of ODE‐constrained OC problems, a main tool is Pontryagin’s maximum principle providing first‐order necessary optimality conditions (Pontryagin, Boltyanskii, Gamkrelidze, & Mishchenko, 1962); see Aniţa (2000), Lenhart and Workman (2007), Grass, Caulkins, Feichtinger, Tragler, and Behrens (2008), and Aniţa, Arnăutu, and Capasso (2011) for textbook expositions, including many examples related to natural resources. The objective often contains a discounted time integral

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call