Abstract

ABSTRACT This article compares and contrasts exogenous (observed) and optimal fiscal policy in an economy with Epstein–Zin (1989, 1991) preferences, with consumption tax, and with a common income tax, using a dynamic general-equilibrium model, calibrated for Bulgarian data (1999–2016). The focus is on the relative importance of consumption versus income taxation, as well as on the provision of utility-enhancing public services. The main findings are: (i) The optimal steady-state income tax rate is zero. (ii) The benevolent Ramsey planner sets optimally the utility-enhancing public services, which are now 25% higher. (iii) The optimal steady-state consumption tax is approximately 50% higher.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.