Abstract

In this paper, we study how a government should set its fiscal instruments in order to provide insurance to individuals and deal with inequality. We quantitatively evaluate the role of public debt and its interaction with progressive income taxation. To guide our assessment, we develop a DSGE model with incomplete markets that embeds two empirical relevant features that have not been considered by the literature: cyclical idiosyncratic risk and the extensive margin of labor supply. We calibrate the model to be consistent with the micro and macro evidence for the US economy. We study the importance of time-varying idiosyncratic risk and labor supply elasticity in determining optimal policies by considering two nested versions of the model that shut down one feature at a time. We find that considering both ingredients together significantly increases the optimal debt to output ratio. In addition, we show that the model generates a positive relationship between public debt and income tax progressivity, consistent to what is observed in the data.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call