Abstract

Recent experiments with brain-machine-interfaces (BMIs) indicate that the extent of neural modulations increased abruptly upon starting to operate the interface, and especially after the monkey stopped moving its hand. In contrast, neural modulations that are correlated with the kinematics of the movement remained relatively unchanged. Here we demonstrate that similar changes are produced by simulated neurons that encode the relevant signals generated by an optimal feedback controller during simulated BMI experiments. The optimal feedback controller relies on state estimation that integrates both visual and proprioceptive feedback with prior estimations from an internal model. The processing required for optimal state estimation and control were conducted in the state-space, and neural recording was simulated by modeling two populations of neurons that encode either only the estimated state or also the control signal. Spike counts were generated as realizations of doubly stochastic Poisson processes with linear tuning curves. The model successfully reconstructs the main features of the kinematics and neural activity during regular reaching movements. Most importantly, the activity of the simulated neurons successfully reproduces the observed changes in neural modulations upon switching to brain control. Further theoretical analysis and simulations indicate that increasing the process noise during normal reaching movement results in similar changes in neural modulations. Thus, we conclude that the observed changes in neural modulations during BMI experiments can be attributed to increasing process noise associated with the imperfect BMI filter, and, more directly, to the resulting increase in the variance of the encoded signals associated with state estimation and the required control signal.

Highlights

  • Brain-Machine Interfaces (BMIs) have been developed to provide a direct communication link between the brain and external devices, bypassing the remaining, potentially injuredInterpreting BMI experiments: control perspective neuro-muscular system (Nicolelis, 2001; Taylor et al, 2002; Lebedev et al, 2005)

  • Experimental Methods The proposed model is evaluated by comparing the different properties of the simulated neural activity to those observed during the BMI experiments described in Carmena et al (2003)

  • While evidence suggests that the variance of the process noise increases with the control signal (Harris and Wolpert, 1998; Wolpert and Ghahramani, 2000), this was not modeled in order to focus on the effect of brain control on process noise and neural modulations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brain-Machine Interfaces (BMIs) have been developed to provide a direct communication link between the brain and external devices, bypassing the remaining, potentially injuredInterpreting BMI experiments: control perspective neuro-muscular system (Nicolelis, 2001; Taylor et al, 2002; Lebedev et al, 2005). We develop an optimal feedback control model (OFC) of BMI experiments to explain the observed changes in neural modulations and to investigate how they are related to changes in state estimation during brain control. While the term “optimal feedback control” emphasizes the optimality of the control gains given the cost function, the main component of interest here is optimal state estimation. This component is hypothesized to integrate visual and proprioceptive information with prior state estimation from an internal model to optimize the posterior state estimate (Miall and Wolpert, 1996; Wolpert and Ghahramani, 2000). The main hypothesis of this paper is that changes in process and measurement noise caused by the switch to brain control can explain the observed changes in neural modulations

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call