Abstract
Background: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common chronic mental disorder with a high disability rate. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs), including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants, such as clomipramine, are the most common choices for the pharmacological treatment of OCD. Optimizing their use is pivotal in guiding clinical practice of OCD. However, there are few studies on the optimal dose of SRIs and there is controversy about their dose–response relationship and optimal target dose. Therefore, the objective of this study was to summarize the relationship between the dose and effect of SRIs, as well as the optimal dose of SRIs for OCD, as to propose future research directions.Methods: Medline, Embase, Biosis, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched for relevant publications, and the search was up to February 22, 2020. We used a one-stage, robust error meta-regression (REMR) model to deal with the correlated dose–response data for SRIs from different studies. Doses of SRIs were converted to fluoxetine equivalents when performing dose–response analysis. Review Manager Program Version 5.3 and STATA software package (version 15.1) were applied to analyze data. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42020168344).Results: Eleven studies involving 2,322 participants were included in final analysis. For SRIs, the dose–efficacy curve showed a gradual increase trend in the 0–40-mg dose range and then had a decreased trend in doses up to 100 mg fluoxetine equivalent. Dropouts due to adverse effects gradually increased throughout the inspected dose slope. The curve of dose of all-cause dropouts suggested no relationship between them. Sensitivity analysis proved that these results were robust.Conclusion: The systematic review found that the optimal dose for efficacy was about 40mg fluoxetine equivalent. Tolerability decreased with increased doses, and there was no significant correlation between acceptability and doses of SRIs. Therefore, the optimal dose of SRIs needs to consider effectiveness and tolerability.Systematic Review Registration: [PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42020168344].
Highlights
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by obsessions and/or compulsions [1]
When we examined different dose-equivalence calculations by the method of SRIdefined daily dose, all results were similar to the primary results (Figure 4)
Dropouts due to any reason were not significantly related to the doses of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs). These outcomes suggested that the increased burden of side effects and the stagnation of therapeutic efficacy increase limited the use of higher doses of SRIs in OCD
Summary
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by obsessions (recurrent, intrusive thoughts, images, or impulses) and/or compulsions (behaviors or mental actions taken repeatedly to decrease anxiety) [1]. Based on the data of clinical trials, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) were recommended as mainstream treatments for OCD for both safety and effectiveness [7]. A comprehensive metaanalysis [8] indicated that SRIs, such as tricyclic antidepressants, clomipramine, and some selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), were highly efficacious for OCD. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs), including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants, such as clomipramine, are the most common choices for the pharmacological treatment of OCD. Optimizing their use is pivotal in guiding clinical practice of OCD. The objective of this study was to summarize the relationship between the dose and effect of SRIs, as well as the optimal dose of SRIs for OCD, as to propose future research directions
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.