Abstract

SummaryBackgroundDepression is the single largest contributor to non-fatal health loss worldwide. Second-generation antidepressants are the first-line option for pharmacological management of depression. Optimising their use is crucial in reducing the burden of depression; however, debate about their dose dependency and their optimal target dose is ongoing. We have aimed to summarise the currently available best evidence to inform this clinical question.MethodsWe did a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of double-blind, randomised controlled trials that examined fixed doses of five selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline), venlafaxine, or mirtazapine in the acute treatment of adults (aged 18 years or older) with major depression, identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, AMED, PSYNDEX, websites of drug licensing agencies and pharmaceutical companies, and trial registries. We imposed no language restrictions, and the search was updated until Jan 8, 2016. Doses of SSRIs were converted to fluoxetine equivalents. Trials of antidepressants for patients with depression and a serious concomitant physical illness were excluded. The main outcomes were efficacy (treatment response defined as 50% or greater reduction in depression severity), tolerability (dropouts due to adverse effects), and acceptability (dropouts for any reasons), all after a median of 8 weeks of treatment (range 4–12 weeks). We used a random-effects, dose-response meta-analysis model with flexible splines for SSRIs, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine.Findings28 554 records were identified through our search (24 524 published and 4030 unpublished records). 561 published and 121 unpublished full-text records were assessed for eligibility, and 77 studies were included (19 364 participants; mean age 42·5 years, SD 11·0; 7156 [60·9%] of 11 749 reported were women). For SSRIs (99 treatment groups), the dose-efficacy curve showed a gradual increase up to doses between 20 mg and 40 mg fluoxetine equivalents, and a flat to decreasing trend through the higher licensed doses up to 80 mg fluoxetine equivalents. Dropouts due to adverse effects increased steeply through the examined range. The relationship between the dose and dropouts for any reason indicated optimal acceptability for the SSRIs in the lower licensed range between 20 mg and 40 mg fluoxetine equivalents. Venlafaxine (16 treatment groups) had an initially increasing dose-efficacy relationship up to around 75–150 mg, followed by a more modest increase, whereas for mirtazapine (11 treatment groups) efficacy increased up to a dose of about 30 mg and then decreased. Both venlafaxine and mirtazapine showed optimal acceptability in the lower range of their licensed dose. These results were robust to several sensitivity analyses.InterpretationFor the most commonly used second-generation antidepressants, the lower range of the licensed dose achieves the optimal balance between efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability in the acute treatment of major depression.FundingJapan Society for the Promotion of Science, Swiss National Science Foundation, and National Institute for Health Research.

Highlights

  • Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide.[1]The number of people living with depression increased by around 18% between 2005 and 2015, and depression affects 322 million people, or about 4% of the world’s population.[1]

  • We included double-blind, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antidepressants among themselves or with placebo as oral monotherapy for the acute-phase treatment of adults of both sexes, with a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder according to standard operationalised diagnostic criteria

  • We evaluated the risk of bias in generation of allocation sequence, allocation concealment, masking of study personnel and participants, masking of outcome assessor, attrition, and selective outcome reporting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide.[1]. The number of people living with depression increased by around 18% between 2005 and 2015, and depression affects 322 million people, or about 4% of the world’s population.[1] Pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy are the two mainstays of depression treatment. Second-generation antidepressants, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), are the first-line options in the pharmacological management of major depression.[2]. There is still uncertainty about the dose dependency and optimal target dose of second-generation agents. Current practice guidelines provide conflicting recommendations: the National Institute of Health and

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call