Optimal door-to-balloon time for primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Abstract

BackgroundDoor-to-balloon time (DTBT) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a performance metric by which primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) services are assessed. MethodsConsecutive patients presenting with STEMI undergoing PPCI between January 2007 to December 2019 from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry were included. Patients were stratified based on DTBT (≤60 min, 61-90 min, 91-180 min) and Killip status (I-III vs. IV). Outcomes assessed included all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30-days and 1-year. ResultsIn total, 13,823 patients were included, with 82.59% achieving DTBT ≤90 min and 49.77% achieving DTBT ≤60 min. For Killip I-III (n = 11,591,83.85%), the median DTBT was 60[46–78]min. The 30-day all-cause mortality for DTBT of ≤60 min, 61-90 min and 91-180 min was 1.08%, 2.17% and 4.33% respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, however, there was no significant difference for 30-day and 1-year outcomes across all DTBT (p > 0.05). For Killip IV, the median DTBT was 68[51–91]min. The 30-day all-cause mortality for DTBT of ≤60 min, 61-90 min and 91-180 min was 11.74%, 20.48% and 35.06% respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis for 30-day and 1-year outcomes, DTBT 91-180 min was an independent predictor of worse outcomes (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between DTBT of ≤60 min and 61-90 min (p > 0.05). ConclusionIn Killip I-III patients, DTBT had no significant impact on outcomes upon adjustment for confounders. Conversely, for Killip IV patients, a DTBT of >90 min was associated with significantly higher adverse outcomes, with no differences between a DTBT of ≤60 min vs. 61-90 min. Outcomes in STEMI involve a complex interplay of factors and recommendations of a lowered DTBT of ≤60 min will require further evaluation.