Abstract

BackgroundType 2 diabetes (T2D) is one of the top non-communicable diseases in Kenya and prevention strategies are urgently needed. Intervening to reduce obesity is the most common prevention strategy. However, black populations develop T2D at lower obesity levels and it is unclear which anthropometric cut-offs could provide the best predictive ability for T2D risk. This study, therefore, aimed to determine the optimal anthropometric cut-offs and their predictive ability of T2D in Kenya.MethodsThe study included 2159 participants (59% women) aged 35–70 years from the Kenya STEPwise survey conducted in 2014. Five anthropometric indices were used—body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist to hip ratio (WHR), waist to height ratio (WHtR) and waist divided by height0.5(WHt.5R). Diabetes was defined as a fasting blood glucose of ≥7.0 mmol/l or a previous diagnosis by a health worker. Optimal anthropometric cut-offs and their receiver operating characteristics, such as the area under the curve (AUC), were computed.ResultsOverall, the optimal cut-off for BMI, WC, WHR, WHtR and WHt.5R were 24.8 kg.m−2, 90 cm, 0.88, 0.54 and 6.9. On disaggregation by sex, the optimal cut-off for BMI, WC, WHR WHtR and WHt.5R was 27.1 kg.m−2, 87 cm, 0.85, 0.55 and 6.9 in women, and 24.8 kg.m−2, 91 cm, 0.88, 0.54 and 6.9 in men. Overall, WC (AUC 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.65, 0.76)) WHtR (AUC 0.71 (0.66, 0.76)) and WHt.5R (AUC 0.70 (0.65,0.75)) had a better predictive ability for T2D than BMI (AUC 0.68 (0.62, 0.73)).ConclusionsWC, WHtR and WHt.5R were better predictors of T2D than BMI and should be used for risk stratification in Kenya. A WC cut-off of 87cm in women and 91cm in men, a WHtR cut-off of 0.54 or a WHt.5R of 6.9 in both men and women should be used to identify individuals at an elevated risk of T2D.

Highlights

  • The prevalence of diabetes is on the rise in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) exerting a disease and economic burden [1]

  • body mass index (BMI), waist to hip ratio (WHR) and waist to height ratio (WHtR) were not associated with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) but each standard deviation increases in waist circumference (WC) and WHt.5R were associated with higher odds of T2D in model 2

  • The optimal BMI cut-off was 27.1 kg.m-2 in women and 24.8 kg.m-2 in men. These findings were consistent with a Ghanaian study which found an overweight BMI of 26.2 kg.m-2 as the optimal cut-off in women [9] and an Ethiopian study that reported a normal weight BMI of 23.0 kg.m-2 as the optimal cut-off in men [13]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The prevalence of diabetes is on the rise in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) exerting a disease and economic burden [1]. Excess body fat is an important risk factor for T2D and anthropometric indices that estimate body fat, such as body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist to hip ratio (WHR), and waist to height ratio (WHtR), have been used to predict risk [3]. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is one of the top non-communicable diseases in Kenya and prevention strategies are urgently needed. Black populations develop T2D at lower obesity levels and it is unclear which anthropometric cut-offs could provide the best predictive ability for T2D risk. This study, aimed to determine the optimal anthropometric cut-offs and their predictive ability of T2D in Kenya. Five anthropometric indices were used—body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist to hip ratio (WHR), waist to height ratio (WHtR) and waist divided by height0.5(WHt.5R). A WC cut-off of 87cm in women and 91cm in men, a WHtR cut-off of 0.54 or a WHt.5R of 6.9 in both men and women should be used to identify individuals at an elevated risk of T2D

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.