Abstract

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the coordination strategy of maximal-effort horizontal jumping in comparison with vertical jumping, using the methodology of computer simulation.MethodsA skeletal model that has nine rigid body segments and twenty degrees of freedom was developed. Thirty-two Hill-type lower limb muscles were attached to the model. The excitation-contraction dynamics of the contractile element, the tissues around the joints to limit the joint range of motion, as well as the foot-ground interaction were implemented. Simulations were initiated from an identical standing posture for both motions. Optimal pattern of the activation input signal was searched through numerical optimization. For the horizontal jumping, the goal was to maximize the horizontal distance traveled by the body's center of mass. For the vertical jumping, the goal was to maximize the height reached by the body's center of mass.ResultsAs a result, it was found that the hip joint was utilized more vigorously in the horizontal jumping than in the vertical jumping. The muscles that have a function of joint flexion such as the m. iliopsoas, m. rectus femoris and m. tibialis anterior were activated to a greater level during the countermovement in the horizontal jumping with an effect of moving the body's center of mass in the forward direction. Muscular work was transferred to the mechanical energy of the body's center of mass more effectively in the horizontal jump, which resulted in a greater energy gain of the body's center of mass throughout the motion.ConclusionThese differences in the optimal coordination strategy seem to be caused from the requirement that the body's center of mass needs to be located above the feet in a vertical jumping, whereas this requirement is not so strict in a horizontal jumping.

Highlights

  • The purpose of this study was to investigate the coordination strategy of maximaleffort horizontal jumping in comparison with vertical jumping, using the methodology of computer simulation

  • A smooth horizontal jumping motion and a smooth vertical jumping motion with a countermovement were generated as results of the numerical optimization (Figure 2)

  • The differences of the coordination strategy of maximal-effort horizontal and vertical jumping motions were examined in this computer simulation study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to investigate the coordination strategy of maximaleffort horizontal jumping in comparison with vertical jumping, using the methodology of computer simulation. To date, jumping motions have been studied by many researchers in the field of biomechanics. One of the major purposes of those preceding studies was to investigate the coordination strategy of the human body during explosive activities. Interesting findings have been reported in numerous studies [1,2,3,4,5], which utilized various forms of vertical jump motions as the subject. There are several major reasons why vertical jump motions have been studied so frequently. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 2007, 6:20 http://www.biomedical-engineering-online.com/content/6/1/20 motions are frequently performed in sports activities. It is practically valuable to investigate the mechanism of vertical jump motions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call