Abstract

The aim of this paper, is to study the performances of closed-loop identification techniques, and choose an optimal closed-loop identification solution, for a flexible transmission system using two recursive closed-loop identification class of methods: the direct closed-loop identification class of methods, called CLOE (Closed Loop Output Error) and the indirect closed-loop identification class of methods called FOL (Filtered Open Loop). The flexible transmission system, for which an optimal closed-loop solution is proposed, is represented by a 4 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sup> order complex plant, with a 2 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">nd</sup> order delay, identified in open-loop[1] for which also a pole-placement control strategy is proposed. The closed-loop identification tests, with the flexible transmission system, are realized in the case of a constant-trace adaptation gain, with a parametric initialization starting from the parameters identified in open-loop.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.