Abstract

This paper uses a benchmark climate model with endogenous technical change to consider the effects of three extensions on optimal policy under a clean transition. First, the movement of workers between non-energy and energy sectors lowers the cost of abatement by more than an order of magnitude, favouring taxes over subsidies. Second, the free movement of researchers between non-energy and energy sectors increases the power of policy to avert environmental disaster and leads to a period of intense research in the clean sector above the long-run share, as productivity in the clean sector catches up to the non-energy sector. Third, a decreasing elasticity of substitution between clean and dirty inputs as the share of clean energy rises is considered, reflecting the increasing difficulty of integrating intermittent clean energy supply in electricity. A decreasing elasticity increases the initial optimal tax on dirty energy and therefore lowers the subsidies required to direct technical change towards clean energy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call