Optimal Chest Drainage Method After Anatomic Lung Resection: A Prospective Observational Study

Abstract

BackgroundSeveral methods for chest drainage after pulmonary resection of malignant lung tumors exist, but consensus on the ideal method has not been reached. MethodsWe conducted a multicenter prospective observational study. We enrolled 2200 patients who underwent lung resection for lung tumors. Of the 1470 patients who underwent anatomic resection, 347 showed air leak on the morning of postoperative day 1. They were assigned to 3 groups according to the chest drainage method on postoperative day 1. ResultsOf 347 patients with postoperative air leaks, 107 (30.8%), 179 (51.6%), and 61 (17.6%) were assigned to water seal, continuous suction, and digital drainage, respectively. The median postoperative air leak duration was significantly longer with digital drainage (4.0 days) than with either water seal (2.5 days) or continuous suction (3.0 days; P = .009). Chest tubes were required for significantly more days on average with digital drainage (6.0 days) than with water seal (4.0 days) or continuous suction (4.0 days; P = .003). Prolongation of air leak duration was significantly more likely to occur in patients with body mass index <18.5 kg/m2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3), moderate or severe air leak on postoperative day 1 (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5-2.6), or digital drainage (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.01-1.9). ConclusionsWater seal was associated with significantly shorter duration of postoperative air leak and chest drainage compared with continuous suction and digital drainage.