Abstract

AbstractBurn‐in tests have been discussed extensively in the reliability literature, wherein we operate items until high degradation values are observed, which could separate the weak units from the normal ones before they get to the market. This concept is often referred to as a screening procedure, and it involves misclassification errors. Commonly, the underlying degradation process is assumed to be a Wiener or a gamma process, based on which several optimal burn‐in policies have been developed in the literature. In this article, we consider the mixture inverse Gaussian process, which possesses monotone degradation paths and some interesting properties. Under this process, we present a decision rule for classifying a unit under test as normal or weak based on burn‐in time and a set of cutoff points. Then, an economic cost model is used to find the optimal burn‐in time and the optimal cutoff points, when the estimation of model parameters is based on an analytical method or an approximate method involving copula theory. Finally, an example of a real dataset on light amplification by stimulated emission of radiations, well known in the reliability literature, is used to illustrate the model and the inferential approach proposed here.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.