Abstract
Background. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is safe and effective alternative to surgical treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis among patients of all risk groups. Optimal implantation depth is key for successful hemodynamic and clinical
 Results. Despite the improvement of prostheses design and increasing experience of operators cardiac conduction abnormalities and paravalvular leak continue to be a significant complication of this procedure, directly affecting the long-term prognosis. Self-expanding valves require special approaches for optimal angiographic projection to assess the implantation depth of the prosthesis. 
 Aims in this study we compared coplanar view and cusp overlap technique during self-expanding aortic valves implantation. 
 Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of 81 TAVI performed in Russian Research Center of Surgery. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the implantation projection: coplanar view (CV) and cusp overlap technique (COT). The incidence of cardiac conduction abnormalities (cumulative incidence of third degree AV block and left bundle branch block) depending on the implantation projection was analyzed. The procedural characteristics in the form of contrast agent volume, fluoroscopic time and operator comfort were also evaluated. 
 Results. After TAVI 16 (51.6%) and 13 (26.0%) patients had cardiac conduction disturbances (cumulative incidence of third degree AV block and left bundle branch block) in the CV and COT respectively (p = 0.019). In the CV group, 2 (6.5%) patients, and in the COT group, 3 (6%) patients had third degree AV block (p = 0.935) and 14 (45.2%) и 10 (20%) left bundle branch block (p = 0,016). In the COT group, there was a significant decrease contrast media (181 66.4 mL vs. 158.9 50.8 mL, p = 0.032). Fluoroscopic time also decreased (23.2 7.7 min vs. 21.3 6.8 min), but without a significant difference (p = 0.678). According to the results of the operator survey, the COT projection was more comfortable. 
 Conclusions. Optimal implantation depth is an important condition for achieving hemodynamic efficiency of the prosthesis and reducing the risk of conduction abnormalities. Operator comfort, better assessment of the implantation depth, safety and efficiency of the cusp overlap technique allow its use as the main implantation view for TAVI.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.