Abstract

Optics measurement algorithms have been improved in preparation for the commissioning of the LHC at higher energy, i.e., with an increased damage potential. Due to machine protection considerations the higher energy sets tighter limits in the maximum excitation amplitude and the total beam charge, reducing the signal to noise ratio of optics measurements. Furthermore the precision in 2012 (4 TeV) was insufficient to understand beam size measurements and determine interaction point (IP) $\ensuremath{\beta}$-functions (${\ensuremath{\beta}}^{*}$). A new, more sophisticated algorithm has been developed which takes into account both the statistical and systematic errors involved in this measurement. This makes it possible to combine more beam position monitor measurements for deriving the optical parameters and demonstrates to significantly improve the accuracy and precision. Measurements from the 2012 run have been reanalyzed which, due to the improved algorithms, result in a significantly higher precision of the derived optical parameters and decreased the average error bars by a factor of three to four. This allowed the calculation of ${\ensuremath{\beta}}^{*}$ values and demonstrated to be fundamental in the understanding of emittance evolution during the energy ramp.

Highlights

  • Optics measurements and corrections are of great importance for the LHC, due to its tight design tolerances on the beam orbit and optical functions

  • Using more beam position monitor (BPM) requires an ansatz for the single phase uncertainty and a thorough analysis of systematic errors and correlations via MonteCarlo simulations

  • For example in the ATLAS and CMS interaction regions (IRs), where the β-function reaches very high values, the phase advances between consecutive BPMs close to the interaction points (IPs) may only be a few degrees

Read more

Summary

Langner

CERN, CH 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland and Universität Hamburg, Luruper Chaussee 149, 22761 Hamburg, Germany. A new, more sophisticated algorithm has been developed which takes into account both the statistical and systematic errors involved in this measurement This makes it possible to combine more beam position monitor measurements for deriving the optical parameters and demonstrates to significantly improve the accuracy and precision. Measurements from the 2012 run have been reanalyzed which, due to the improved algorithms, result in a significantly higher precision of the derived optical parameters and decreased the average error bars by a factor of three to four. This allowed the calculation of βà values and demonstrated to be fundamental in the understanding of emittance evolution during the energy ramp

INTRODUCTION
N-BPM METHOD
Statistical uncertainty of the measured β-function
Systematic uncertainties
Range of BPMs
MODEL PRECISION
PROPAGATION TO ELEMENTS
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.