Abstract

Broadband passive daytime radiative cooling (PDRC) materials exhibit sub-ambient surface temperatures and contribute highly to mitigating extreme urban heat during the warm period. However, their application may cause undesired overcooling problems in winter. This study aims to assess, on a city scale, different solutions to overcome the winter overcooling penalty derived from using PDRC materials. Furthermore, a mesoscale urban modeling system assesses the potential of the optical modulation of reflectance (ρ) and emissivity (ε) to reduce, minimize, or reverse the overcooling penalty. The alteration of heat flux components, air temperature modification, ground and roof surface temperature, and the urban canopy temperature are assessed. The maximum decrease of the winter ambient temperature using standard PDRC materials is 1.1 °C and 0.8 °C for daytime and nighttime, respectively, while the ρ+ε-modulation can increase the ambient temperature up to 0.4 °C and 1.4 °C, respectively, compared to the use of conventional materials. Compared with the control case, the maximum decrease of net radiation inflow occurred at the peak hour, reducing by 192.7 Wm−2 for the PDRC materials, 5.4 Wm−2 for ρ-modulated PDRC materials, and 173.7 Wm−2 for ε-PDRC materials; nevertheless, the ρ+ε-modulated PDRC materials increased the maximum net radiation inflow by 51.5 Wm−2, leading to heating of the cities during the winter.

Highlights

  • Extreme urban heat is the most documented phenomenon of climate change

  • The main aim of this study is to investigate the overcooling penalty reduction by introducing different modulation techniques for the use of passive daytime radiative cooling (PDRC) materials during the cold period and their effect on a city scale

  • To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the thermal performance of standard and modulated PDRC materials will be assessed, and their impact on urban climatic characteristics evaluated, at a city scale during the winter period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Extreme urban heat is the most documented phenomenon of climate change. It is related to higher ambient temperatures in dense urban areas compared to the surrounding suburban and rural areas [1]. The phenomenon is experimentally documented in more than 450 cities worldwide, and its magnitude may be as high as 10 ◦ C [2,3]. Higher urban temperatures significantly influence energy use, ambient air, and health, augmenting cooling energy consumption and increasing peak power demand, pollutant concentrations, and heat-related morbidity and mortality [4,5,6]. To counterbalance the impact of urban overheating, several heat mitigation technologies have been researched and implemented.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call