Optically active aromatic amino acids. Part VI. Synthesis and properties of (Leu5)-enkephalin analogues containing O-methyl-L-tyrosine1 with ring substitution at position 3'.

Abstract

Twelve new [Tyr(Me)1, Leu5]-enkephalin analogues with substituents at position 3' of the Tyr ring have been synthesized using traditional solution methods. The substituents were -CO2H, -CONH2, -CO2Me, -(E)-CH=NOH, -(E)-CH=NOMe and CH2OH. The analogues were C-terminated with methyl esters, amides or as free acids. In the in vitro biological assays a remarkable agonist activity to the opiate receptor mu in guinea pig ileum (GPI) relative to Leu-ENK was shown by the following: Leu-ENK, 100; [Tyr(Me)(3'-CO2Me)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (I), 8.1; [Tyr(Me)(3'-(E)-CH=NOH)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (VI), 26.2; [Tyr(Me)(3'-(E)-CH=NOH)1, Leu-OH5]-ENK (VII), 2.9; [Tyr(Me)(3'-(E)-CH=NOH)1, Leu-NH2(5)]-ENK (VIII), 4.7; and [Tyr(Me)(3'-CH2OH)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (X), 5.6. The agonist effect was naltrexone- or naloxone-reversible. The masking of the hydroxyl group in (E)-hydroxyiminomethyl group of analogue (VI) by O-methylation has totally abolished its GPI agonist activity. It seems that the (E)-CH=NOH group shows affinity and plays an analogous role to the phenol group Tyr1 in leucine-enkephalin and in the tyramine group of the opiate alkaloids. The analogues: [Tyr(Me)(3'-CO2Me)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (I), [Tyr(Me)(3'-CO2H)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (II), [Tyr(Me)(3'-CO2Me)1, Leu-NH2(5)]-ENK (III), [Tyr(Me)(3'-CO2H)1, Leu-NH2(5)]-ENK (IV), [Tyr(Me)(3'-CONH2)1, Leu-NH2(5)]-ENK (V), [Tyr(Me)(3'-(E)-CH=NOH)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (VI), [Tyr(Me)(3'-(E)-CH=NOH)1, Leu-OH5]-ENK (VII), [Tyr(Me)(3'-(E)-CH=NOH)1, Leu-NH2(5)]-ENK (VIII), [Tyr(Me)(3'-(E)-CH=NOMe)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (IX), [Tyr(Me)(3'-CH2OH)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (X), [Tyr(Me)(3'-CH2OH)1, Leu-OH5]-ENK (XI) and [Tyr(Me)(3'-CH2OH)1, Leu-NH2(5)]-ENK (XII) under testing had no significant agonist activity to the enkephalinergic receptor in mouse vas deferens (MVD). All methyl esters of synthesized analogues of [Leu5]-ENK showed higher activity to mu receptors than structurally identical C-terminal amides. It is a surprising result since usually C-terminate amides are stronger agonists than C-terminate esters.