Abstract

Underwater optical wireless systems have dual requirements of high data rates and long ranges in harsh scattering and attenuation conditions. In this paper, we investigate the advantages and limitations of optical orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (O-OFDM) signaling when a silicon photo-multiplier (SiPM) is used at the receiver in order to ensure high sensitivity. Considering a light-emitting diode (LED) transmitter and taking into account the limited dynamic range imposed by the transmitter and the SiPM receiver, we study the performance of three popular O-OFDM schemes, i.e., DC-biased, asymmetrically-clipped, and layered asymmetrically-clipped O-OFDM (DCO-, ACO-, and LACO-OFDM, respectively). We consider a constraint on transmit electrical power and take into account the required DC bias for the three considered schemes in practice, showing the undeniable advantage of ACO- and LACO-OFDM in terms of energy efficiency. For instance, for the considered SiPM and LED components, a spectral efficiency of ∼1 bps/Hz with a data rate of 20 Mbps, a link range of 70 m, and a target bit-error-rate (BER) of , ACO and LACO allow a reduction of about 10 and 6 mW, respectively, in the required , compared to DCO-OFDM. Meanwhile, we show that when relaxing the constraint, DCO-OFDM offers the largest operational link range within which a target BER can be achieved. For instance, for a target BER of and a data rate of 20 Mbps, and considering of 185, 80, and 50 mW for DCO-, LACO-, and ACO-OFDM, respectively, the corresponding intervals of operational link range are about 81, , and m. Lastly, we show that LACO-OFDM makes a good compromise between energy efficiency and operational range flexibility, although requiring a higher computational complexity and imposing a longer latency at the receiver.

Highlights

  • The increasing need to explore underwater resources has given rise to the development of high-performance underwater equipment and robotics with data transmission capability

  • Taking into account the effects of upper and lower signal clipping at the Tx, silicon photo-multiplier (SiPM) saturation at the Rx at relatively short ranges, and beam attenuation in water, we show that, overall, ACO-OFDM has an undeniable advantage over the two other schemes in terms of energy efficiency for low-to-moderate spectral efficiencies

  • For the case of an SiPM-based underwater wireless optical communications (UWOCs) system and in order to increase the link data rate, this work investigated the use of high spectral efficiency modulation schemes based on orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (O-OFDM), namely the three schemes of DCO, ACO, and LACO-OFDM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The increasing need to explore underwater resources has given rise to the development of high-performance underwater equipment and robotics with data transmission capability. The primary challenges for UWOC systems include extending the range and enhancing the data rate of such links To address the former, silicon photo-multipliers (SiPMs), called multi-pixel photon counters (MPPCs), have recently drawn particular attention thanks to their high internal gain, allowing a high receiver (Rx) sensitivity, and operation over large distances. Given the limited DR of an SiPM, which primarily impacts Rx performance at relatively short ranges [6,7], the use of O-OFDM signaling could impose further limitations in practice. Taking into account the effects of upper and lower signal clipping at the Tx, SiPM saturation at the Rx at relatively short ranges, and beam attenuation in water, we show that, overall, ACO-OFDM has an undeniable advantage over the two other schemes in terms of energy efficiency for low-to-moderate spectral efficiencies.

High Spectral Efficiency State-of-the-Art Techniques
General Assumptions
Modeling Received Optical Power
SiPM Modeling
Optical OFDM Signaling
Classical O-OFDM Schemes
Improving Spectral Efficiency with Respect to DCO-OFDM
DCO-OFDM
ACO-OFDM
LACO-OFDM
Computational Complexity
Adapting the Signal Amplitude to the LED DR
Parameter Specification
Comparison with OOK
Clipping Effect on the Link Performance
Impact of Data Rate and Transmit Power
Relaxing the Transmit Power Constraint
Impact of QAM Constellation Size
Increasing Link Span Using Multiple LEDs
Impact of Bias Selection for DCO-OFDM
Discussions and Conclusions
Main Conclusions
Considered Assumptions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.