Abstract

Optic ataxia is characterized by inaccuracies in body movements under visual control, and is a common consequence of damage to the posterior parietal lobes in humans. It is argued here that optic ataxia can be characterized as a deficit in the visual on-line guidance of actions, with action planning remaining relatively intact. This contrasts with the common view of optic ataxia as representing a deficit in the transformations that take place between visual inputs and motor outputs. Evidence in support of the planning-control view comes from the pattern of spared and disrupted behaviors in patients with optic ataxia. It is shown that spared behaviors are those that emphasize planning, whereas disrupted behaviors are those that emphasize control. In particular, recent studies have highlighted the inability of a patient with optic ataxia to make on-line adjustments to targets that change position during the movement. Taken in sum, the data from patients with optic ataxia is more consistent with the planning-control interpretation of optic ataxia than with the visuomotor transformation interpretation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call