Abstract

This paper is a case study of the final decision taken in the case M & F × Bank Santander, et al. (RE n°1.555.202-SP/Brazilian Superior Court of Justice). It intends to answer two questions: whether it is reasonable to repudiate—as the Court did—the termination written clause of the contract signed by the Parties in the light of good-faith principle; and, assuming Bank Santander violated such principle when trying to terminate the contract, what the proper remedy due is. Our findings demonstrate that the Court did a good job by repudiating the termination written clause on good-faith grounds, but failed to stipulate a correct indemnity.

Highlights

  • In March 2017, the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice for federal law interpretation held that an opt-out clause is not a blank check to a party that wants to put an end to a contract

  • This paper is a case study of the final decision taken in the case M & F × Bank Santander, et al (RE n1.555.202-SP/Brazilian Superior Court of Justice)

  • Even if we overcome the uncertainty about the parties’ intent and assume it was possible to infer that the opt-out clause—as stated—could cover the circumstance the Bank called it for, the general rule of good faith connected to the parties’ performance would impose to the Bank a different course of action

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In March 2017, the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice for federal law interpretation held that an opt-out clause is not a blank check to a party that wants to put an end to a contract It ruled that this right must be performed in accordance with the general principle of good faith, which calls for a highly context-specific understanding of honesty and reasonableness. In Part 2, I provide the main information regarding the case study In accordance to such a decision under analysis, I argue in Part 3 that the duty of acting in good-faith—which is a matter of law in Brazil—is enough to refrain the Bank from taking advantages of the vulnerabilities created by the sequential character of the contractual performance.

The Case
The Indemnity Legal Framing
Findings with Analysis
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.