Abstract

This paper uses a robust valuation model and data available in 1985–1989 to conduct a synthetic market-value accounting of the year-to-year opportunity cost of FSLIC forbearance. Although opportunity cost did not increase in every single year, it did increase on average over the period. Had robust mark-to-model standards for S&L capital adequacy been routinely enforced, FSLIC guarantees would not have displaced private capital on a mammoth scale and surviving members of the industry would have proved more profitable. Lessening hidden tax liabilities for households and hidden subsidies to risky lending would have shortened the disinflation process and allowed the U.S. to hold a more valuable capital stock today.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.