Opportunities for expanded nurse and nurse navigator involvement in design, implementation and management of remote patient monitoring programs.

Abstract

564 Background: The use of remote patient monitoring (RPM) in oncology for timely reporting of adverse events to improve patient outcomes is well-documented; however, less is known about real-world implementation of RPM and its impact on workforce needs. To assess use and perceptions about RPM, including its role in patient reported outcomes (PROs), the Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) surveyed U.S. cancer program staff. Methods: Developed by expert advisors and patient advocacy partners, a survey of cancer program staff was distributed between December 2022 and January 2023. The survey included 25 closed and open-ended questions. Results: 128 multidisciplinary cancer program staff completed the survey, of which 45% are actively planning/implementing RPM programs. 34 U.S. states were represented. The three largest roles represented were medical oncologists (n=54; 42%), cancer program administrators (n=18; 14%) and nurses/nurse navigators (n=14; 11%). Of all respondents, 82% viewed nursing teams as the most appropriate to review and triage RPM data. Nurses indicated less involvement with the design/development of RPM programs (0%) compared to administrators (33%) and oncologists (48%). Similarly, 3% of nurses reported involvement in monitoring or taking actions on RPM data, compared to 12% of administrators and 56% of oncologists. Notably, no nurses compared to 6% of administrators and 18% of oncologists strongly agreed that they had access to educational resources and training needed to support a RPM program. In qualitative responses, nurses indicated provider education as the greatest need for RPM to become standard of care in cancer programs. Conclusions: Despite a high perceived need for nursing involvement in all aspects of RPM programs, real-world data indicates that nurses, who are expected to monitor/triage RPM data by most of their peers, are less frequently involved in the design and implementation of RPM programs. Future research is needed to understand these workforce barriers, and to explore novel approaches to tailored provider education and engagement to ensure that RPM programs benefit from diverse workforce and patient involvement.