Opioidsubstitutionstherapie im Rahmen der neuen Betäubungsmittel-Verschreibungsverordnung aus Sicht von Apothekerinnen und Apothekern

Abstract

BackgroundOpioid agonist therapy (OAT) has been established to be the most important therapy option for improving health and social burdens of people with opioid dependence. Pharmacies provide drug substitutes to substitution practices or outpatient clinics and administer drugs to substituted patients (medication under visual control) or supply prescriptions for unsupervised, at-home use by patients. Given the gaps in medical care, the relevance of pharmacies for the comprehensive treatment of opioid-dependent patients will become even more important in the future. The 3rd Revision of the Narcotic Drugs Prescription Ordinance (NDPO) adopted sweeping reforms to the framework of OAT in 2017. This paper examines the impact of this reform from the pharmacist's perspective. MethodsBetween November 2020 and March 2021, pharmacists in the German federal states of Hamburg, North-Rhine Westphalia, Saxony, and Bavaria were informed by their State Chambers of Pharmacists about participation in this online study. A total of 480 questionnaires were evaluated. The analysis differentiates between pharmacists who are currently involved in the substitution of opioid-dependent patients (54.2%), pharmacists who were involved in the past (21.4%), and those who have never been involved in opioid substitution (24.4%). ResultsPharmacists involved in OAT have not seen any positive changes resulting from the 3rd Revision of the NDPO. According to 97.9% of the pharmacists, remuneration for administering medication under visual control should be analogous to remuneration in doctors’ practices. Mixed prescriptions (prescription of take-home dose and intermediate medication under visual control) increase the administrative workload and have been rejected by a quarter of the pharmacists. Non-involved pharmacists significantly overestimated the occurrence of critical situations with substituted patients in the pharmacy. While only 2.7% of pharmacists involved in OAT reported drug emergencies, 23.1% of non-involved pharmacists expressed such concerns. 39.3% of the pharmacists felt they could be motivated to participate in OAT if they were approached directly, and 73.9% of the pharmacists who are currently involved in OAT said they could provide substitution medication under visual control to additional opioid-dependent patients. ConclusionsThe 3rd Revision of the NDPO has no influence on the situation and willingness of pharmacists to be involved in OAT. However, to ensure that pharmacists continue to be actively involved in OAT and attract new substituting pharmacies, their importance for comprehensive OAT must be upgraded. This includes, and not least, the funding of pharmacists’ administration of substitution drugs under visual control. In addition, knowledge about OAT, attitudes toward opioid-dependent patients, and contact anxiety could be addressed by promoting educational awareness and training.