Abstract
The paper focuses on testing the use of conversational Large Language Model (LLM), in particularchatGPT and Google models, instructed to assume the role of linguistics experts to produce opinions. Incontrast to knowledge/evidence-based objective factual statements, opinions are defined as subjective statements about animates, things, events or properties in the context of an Opinion (Speech) Event in a social cultural context. Taxonomy distinguishes explicit (direct/indirect) and implicit opinions (positive, negative, ambiguous, or balanced). Contextually richer prompts at the LLMs training phase are shown to be needed to deal with variants of implicit opinion scenario types.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.