Abstract

We sought to determine whether there is a relation between operator volume and outcomes for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). A 1993 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force stated that cardiologists should perform > or = 75 procedures/year to maintain competency in PCIs; however, there were limited data available to support this statement. Data were collected from 1990 through 1993 on 12,988 PCIs (12,118 consecutive hospital admissions) performed by 31 cardiologists at two hospitals in New Hampshire and two in Maine and one hospital in Massachusetts supporting these procedures. Operators were categorized into terciles based on annualized volume of procedures. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to control for case-mix. Successful outcomes included angiographic success (all lesions attempted dilated to < 50% residual stenosis) and clinical success (at least one lesion dilated to < 50% residual stenosis and no adverse outcomes). In-hospital adverse outcomes included coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), myocardial infarction (MI) and death. After adjustment for case-mix, higher angiographic (low, middle and high terciles: 84.7%, 86.1% and 90.3%, p-trend 0.006) and clinical success rates (85.8%, 88.0% and 90.7%, p-trend 0.025), with fewer referrals to CABG (4.54%, 3.75% and 2.49%, p-trend <0.001), were seen as operator volume increased. There was a trend toward higher MI rates for high volume operators (2.00%, 1.98% and 2.57%, p-trend 0.06); all terciles had similar in-hospital mortality rates (1.09%, 0.96% and 1.05%, p-trend 0.8). There is a significant relation between operator volume and outcomes in PCIs. Efforts should be directed toward understanding why high volume operators are more successful and encounter fewer adverse outcomes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.