Abstract
This research demonstrates that the methylation of N‐benzyl cysteine Schiff base derived NiII complexes leads to the formation of the corresponding dehydroalanine‐containing products and cannot be used for preparation of the target α‐(methyl)cysteine. In sharp contrast, the alternative strategy that involves thiomethylation of NiII complexes of alanine Schiff bases is a viable and practically attractive approach to afford the desired α‐(methyl)cysteine containing derivatives. This work also reveals a significant, and rather unexpected, difference in the stereochemical performance of proline and 3,5‐dihydro‐4H‐dinaphth[2,1‐c:1′,2′‐e]azepine derived chiral ligands, the former of which shows superior performance in terms of chemical yields and diastereoselectivity of the α‐(methyl)cysteine products formed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.