Operational sex ratio, reproductive costs, and the potential for intrasexual competition

Abstract

Even though numerous metrics exist, we still appear to be far from a consensual view on the best way of measuring or predicting the potential strength of sexual selection. One of the earliest and simplest metrics devised was the operational sex ratio (OSR) (i.e. the ratio between sexually active males and females in a population), and even, if heavily criticized, the OSR can still be viewed as a valuable measure of the potential levels of intrasexual competition. Because this ratio is influenced by the time that individuals spend in the mating pool, the OSR depends on our ability to determine who is indeed ready to mate. Moreover, because the proximate effects of OSR on mate monopolization might not be immediately apparent, we should be prepared to account for its association with the conditions making selection favour traits that reduce the time needed to acquire additional mating opportunities. Using the worm pipefish as a working model, we conducted a more stringent calculation of the OSR by eliminating individuals that, although present, do not appear to be able to reproduce, as determined by an analysis of female size classes with immature or spent ovaries and male classes without pregnancy events. Accordingly, the OSR was not only capable of correctly highlighting the potential for intrasexual competition, but also was able to translate the desertion of individuals from the mating pool as the breeding season progressed into meaningful correlations with variables associated with reproductive investment and costs (i.e. gonad investment and energy reserves). As demonstrated, the predictive power of the OSR can be broader than anticipated, depending primarily on our ability to effectively discriminate which individuals are indeed ready to mate. © 2013 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 110, 477–484.