Abstract
In the Basel II Accord, banks are encouraged to use the Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA), which is suitable for banks to assess operational risk capital, but banks are required to demonstrate their ability to capture severe tail loss events. In this paper, based on the 860 operational risk loss data of Chinese commercial banks collected from public reports from 1995 to 2006, we found that the sample data set is characterized as having heavier tail than normal distribution. Then we use loss distribution approach (LDA) to measure the operational risk and operational risk capital of Chinese commercial banks. Next, we compare operational risk economic capital of Chinese commercial banks with operational risk economic capital (EC) of other major banks. We discover that the operational risk of Chinese commercial banks is larger than that of some foreign major commercial banks.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
