Abstract

Default reasoning is one of the most common forms of nonmonotonic reasoning, and is found in many application domains. Default logic and its variants have been proposed as knowledge representation methods capable of default reasoning. One problem of all these methods is that their concepts are given in terms of fixed-point equations, thus making them difficult to understand and use. In this paper, we present simple, constructive approaches for the semantics of some default logic variants, and show their correctness.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.