Abstract

Operant conditioning is implemented in brain-machine interfaces (BMI) to induce rapid volitional modulation of single neuron activity to control arbitrary mappings with an external actuator. However, intrinsic factors of the volitional controller (i.e. the brain) or the output stage (i.e. individual neurons) might hinder performance of BMIs with more complex mappings between hundreds of neurons and actuators with multiple degrees of freedom. Improved performance might be achieved by studying these intrinsic factors in the context of BMI control. In this study, we investigated how neuron subtypes respond and adapt to a given BMI task. We conditioned single cortical neurons in a BMI task. Recorded neurons were classified into bursting and non-bursting subtypes based on their spike-train autocorrelation. Both neuron subtypes had similar improvement in performance and change in average firing rate. However, in bursting neurons, the activity leading up to a reward increased progressively throughout conditioning, while the response of non-bursting neurons did not change during conditioning. These results highlight the need to characterize neuron-subtype-specific responses in a variety of tasks, which might ultimately inform the design and implementation of BMIs.

Highlights

  • Operant conditioning is implemented in brain-machine interfaces (BMI) to induce rapid volitional modulation of single neuron activity to control arbitrary mappings with an external actuator

  • Single cortical neurons can be the sole output to a ­BMI12,17, recent evidence shows there might be different levels of utility based on the neuron ­type[27,28], as well as different strategies to execute a BMI task

  • To condition the single neuron activity, we selected a single unit from the available pool in a given day

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Operant conditioning is implemented in brain-machine interfaces (BMI) to induce rapid volitional modulation of single neuron activity to control arbitrary mappings with an external actuator. In bursting neurons, the activity leading up to a reward increased progressively throughout conditioning, while the response of non-bursting neurons did not change during conditioning These results highlight the need to characterize neuron-subtype-specific responses in a variety of tasks, which might inform the design and implementation of BMIs. Brain-machine interfaces (BMI) exploit the adaptability of the brain to modify cortical circuits for the purpose of controlling neuroprosthetic ­devices[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. We found that both bursting and non-bursting neurons significantly increased the reward frequency and average firing rates as the experiment progressed, but only bursting neurons did so by gradually incrementing the magnitude of the event integral leading to a reward Considering these neuronsubtype-specific responses might inform the design of BMIs, as it is a step forward in investigating the inherent capabilities of different neuron subtypes to control a BMI

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call