Abstract
AbstractThe reliability and quality of volunteered geographic information (VGI) continue to be pressing concerns. Many VGI projects lack standard geospatial data quality assurance procedures, and the reliability of contributors remains in question. Traditional approaches rely on comparing VGI to an “authoritative” or “gold standard” dataset to assess quality. This study investigates VGI quality by analysing the OpenStreetMap (OSM) database in Ottawa‐Gatineau, focusing on historical map features and contributor data to gain an understanding of how users are contributing to the database, and their ability to do so accurately. Unsupervised machine learning analyses expose a cluster of experienced contributors classified as “OSM validators/experts”, which are then further used to attribute data quality. They are identified through a combination of strong contribution loadings associated with the use and experience of advanced OSM editors, and weaker loadings associated with feature creation and frequency of contributions leading to further correction. Limitations are discussed with implications for future work.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
