Abstract

Many developing economies have become increasingly disenchanted with the operations of the World Trade Organisation and the global trading system in general, reflecting a perception that their interests and concerns have been neglected. Inevitably this has reduced the enthusiasm of many governments for participating in further rounds of multilateral trade and investment talks. Yet international trade and investment liberalisation are far from complete, suggesting that it may still be worthwhile to pursue reforms to the rules governing the multilateral trading system. This paper assesses the evidence for the proposition that the interests of developing countries will be enhanced through greater international openness and draws out some of the implications for the issues confronting them in any future round of negotiations. The evidence suggests that greater international openness can help to raise per capita incomes, but the gains from greater openness are by no means automatic. Openness is part of a development strategy, not a substitute for one, and needs to be complemented by a sound institutional and legal framework, along with timely and predictable enforcement of the rules embodied in that framework. Developing economies have much to gain from further multilateral liberalisation of trade policies, but are unlikely to achieve those gains without assistance to help develop their existing institutional and social capabilities.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.