Abstract

The rise of the World Wide Web represents one of the most significant transitions in communications since the printing press or even since the origins of writing. To Open Access and Open Data advocates, the web offers great opportunity for expanding the accessibility, scale, diversity and quality of archaeological communications. Nevertheless, Open Access and Open Data face steep adoption barriers. Critics wrongly see Open Access as a threat to peer review. Others see data transparency as naively technocratic and lacking in an appreciation of archaeology's social and professional incentive structure. However, as argued in this paper, the Open Access and Open Data movements do not gloss over sustainability, quality and professional incentive concerns. Rather, these reform movements offer much needed and trenchant critiques of the academy's many dysfunctions. These dysfunctions, ranging from the expectations of tenure and review committees to the structure of the academic publishing industry, go largely unknown and unremarked by most archaeologists. At a time of cutting fiscal austerity, Open Access and Open Data offer desperately needed ways to expand research opportunities, reduce costs and expand the equity and effectiveness of archaeological communication.

Highlights

  • The late 1990s saw wild speculation about how the Internet fundamentally changed the economy, which helped fuel the NASDAQ’s unsustainable inflation of dot-com stock prices

  • Science Commons14 and the allied Open Knowledge Foundation15 came to broadly similar conclusions about key requirements for Open Data: 1. Technical Openness: Data must be available in widely used, nonproprietary file formats that can work across multiple computing and software platforms

  • The SCOAP322 consortium, a collaboration between laboratories, libraries, and funding agencies represents the highest profile attempt to redirect money currently allocated to subscriptions to directly pay for production, editing, and review costs associated with Open Access publications

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The late 1990s saw wild speculation about how the Internet fundamentally changed the economy, which helped fuel the NASDAQ’s unsustainable inflation of dot-com stock prices. Expertise and experience in these areas is in high demand both inside and outside of the Academy, leading to more job and grant opportunities, wider collaborative ties, and well-paying consulting engagements In these cases, Open Access publishing and participation in Open Data projects can play very pragmatic career advancement roles for technologically-oriented archaeologists on Alt-ac trajectories. There is a stronger incentive to publish in multidisciplinary venues that cover topics in the digital humanities, scholarly communications, and data management In such emerging areas of research, many leading publication venues are Open Access. Science Commons and the allied Open Knowledge Foundation came to broadly similar conclusions about key requirements for Open Data: 1. Technical Openness: Data must be available in widely used, nonproprietary file formats that can work across multiple computing and software platforms

Access
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call