Abstract
ObjectiveThe objective of this meta-analysis was to illustrate the clinical outcomes and safety of two different management options for Song stage 2–4 lateral condyle humeral fractures in children.MethodIn January 2023, a systematic computer-based search was conducted. Data were retrieved for patients with two different management options for lateral condyle humeral fractures in children. The primary endpoints were clinical outcomes based on infection, avascular necrosis, and nonunion. After testing for publication bias and heterogeneity between studies, the data was aggregated for stochastic effect models when necessary.ResultsEight clinical studies with 742 patients were eventually included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and open reduction and internal fixation in terms of the clinical outcomes based on infection, avascular necrosis, and nonunion (P > 0.05).ConclusionsClosed reduction and percutaneous pinning, as well as open reduction and internal fixation of lateral condyle humeral fractures in children, resulted in similar structural stability and functional outcomes. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to determine this conclusion.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
