Open mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

BackgroundThe optimal methodology of surgical treatment of umbilical hernia in adults remains controversial. Previously published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies have demonstrated advantage for open mesh over suture repair. Two published meta-analyses, including RCTs and retrospective cohort studies, have compared the outcomes of open mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adult, which were flawed since they included both elective and emergency repairs of umbilical hernias. The aim of this meta-analysis is to include RCTs to examine whether open mesh repair of umbilical hernia produces a better outcome than suture repair in adult patients. MethodsA literature search using Medline, Embase and Cochrane Database was performed, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.5 software. Outcomes evaluated incidence of hernia recurrence, wound infection, haematoma, seroma and patient death. ResultsOf the 620 records identified, 4 RCTs, including 620 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. In the RCTS, when open mesh repair was compared with suture repair, open mesh repair was associated with significantly low incidence of recurrence (odds ratio (OR) 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10–0.48; P = 0.0001). The incidence of wound infection (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.35–2.31; P = 0.82), haematoma (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.28–2.41; P = 0.73), and seroma (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.82–4.91; P = 0.13), were similar between the two groups. ConclusionsOpen mesh repair was associated with significant reduction in the recurrence rate in comparison to suture repair of umbilical hernia.