Open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children: A regional experience

Abstract

PurposeThe optimal approach for pediatric inguinal hernia repair continues to be debated. We conducted a regional retrospective study to assess rates of recurrence and metachronous hernias after open repair (OPEN) and laparoscopic repair (LAP) MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at two children's hospitals that serve a region of approximately 4 million people. All patients < 14 years old undergoing OPEN or LAP by pediatric surgeons during a 5-year period (2011 – 2015) were analyzed after a minimum follow up of 4 years. Cox proportional regression was used to compare the effect of surgical approach on hernia recurrence and metachronous contralateral hernias. ResultsA total of 1,952 patients, 587 female (30%) and 1365 male (70%), had 2305 hernias repaired. Median post operative follow up time was 6.6 years (range 4–9 years). OPEN and LAP were performed for 1827 (79%) and 478 (21%) hernias, respectively. There were no significant differences in rate of prematurity, age at repair, or frequency of emergent repair. LAP was associated with a lower incidence of metachronous contralateral hernias compared to OPEN (1.4% vs 3.8%, p = 0.047), and a higher incidence of recurrence (9% vs 0.9%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, LAP had a higher rate of recurrence than OPEN (hazard ratio 10.4, 95% CI 6–18.1).The recurrence rate did not decrease over the study period (p = 0.731). ConclusionLaparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children resulted in a modest decrease in the incidence of metachronous hernias, at the cost of a significant increase in recurrence. Type of StudyRetrospective Comparative Study. Level of evidenceLevel III.