OP147 Measuring Health Technology Assessment Impact On The Introduction Of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement In A Private Healthcare System

Abstract

IntroductionAortic stenosis is an insidious disease that has a high mortality rate when it becomes symptomatic. Surgical valve replacement is the treatment of choice and has predictable risks. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a less invasive alternative to surgery, which is indicated for high-risk patients.Complications after TAVR include paravalvular leak, cerebrovascular events, and the need for pacemaker implantation. A health technology assessment report carried out by the Health Technology Assessment Unimed-BH group in 2018, two years before it became part of the National Supplementary Health Agency, recommended the introduction of TAVR with the following criteria: indications provided by a group of specialists; forwarding of a report with detailed clinical data; results of imaging exams; and follow-up results for up to one year after the procedure. After the introduction of TAVR with the agreed criteria, it was possible to access TAVR results from the private healthcare system of Unimed-BH.MethodsAdministrative data were collected from the Unimed-BH database. All patients who received a TAVR implant from 2013 to 2017 were included by virtue of a court injunction, and after 2018 by operator concession and within agreed criteria.ResultsFrom July 2013 to June 2019, 83 patients underwent TAVR implantation by Unimed BH. The median age of patients was 83.4 years (interquartile range 66.5 to 97.9), most of whom were women (56%). There was a predominance of patients in New York Heart Association classification III (50%) and IV (29%). There were 36 patients who underwent TAVR before 2018 and 47 patients within the agreed criteria. In the period prior to the agreed criteria, 28 percent needed a pacemaker, compared with 23 percent after 2018. During the follow-up period, 39 patients died: 18 (50%) before 2018 and 11 (23%) after 2018.ConclusionsThe agreement made with the providers, which included the obligation of having a team of specialists responsible for the indication and access to clinical data through the report, improved patient outcomes. This may be due to having a better indication for the procedure or to the greater experience of the professionals involved in its delivery.